|
|
|
-
9 nights with 19-month old
Here's a question for you more experienced parents out there. We're hoping to be taking our then 19-month old to WDW next October. If all goes well, we'll be staying in a theme-park view studio. Is that too long with a 19-month old? We're thinking it would give us more time to actually be able to take our time. Thanks in advance!
~Jen, Jon, Collin, & Brady~
Owners in BLT!!
Next trip: BCV in February 2019!
So many great trips!!
Off-site the first trips
Disney Villas(way back!)
CBR
AS Mu/Mo/Sp
CSR
POR x2
AKL/BW
BLT
BWV
Poly DVC
1363 miles from WDW - too far!! :-(
-
Please Support INTERCOT's Sponsors:
-
It might be... We've gone to more, shorter vacations, and are building back up. I like doing longer trips and taking time, but the routine breakup sems to be taking it's toll. You are a better gauge of how that disruption will go.
-
Visting WDW with a child (children) is completely different, especially when so young. That being said, I don't think 9 nights is too long because as you said you will be able to take your time and move at a slower pace and relax (as much as you can with a 19-month old). Keep in mind, that you will not be able to go on the big rides unless you go one at a time. Hey, any day at WDW is a great day!
-
You know your child best. Personally, for me and my children, 9 days would be too long. My kids liked being home and really liked their routine. Even going at a slower pace, WDW can still be an exhausting trip (on the kids and the parents!).
Karen
10/97 Dolphin w/ friends
02/00 Off-site w/ DH
09/06 POFQ w/ DD and friends
09/07 AKL w/ DH, DD and DS!
09/08 POR w/DS and friends
05/10 CR w/ DH, DD and DS
05/11 Hard Rock US/IOA w/ DH, DD and DS
05/13 Royal Pacific US/IOA w/ DH, DD and DS
02/16 Hard Rock US/IOA w/ DH, DD and DS
-
IMO 9 days in a studio with a 19mo might be a strain. Depending on the points, maybe a stay of 6 nights in a 1bdrm would be better. It would give you more space (don't forget a 19mo will be mobile), full kitchen and the washer and dryer.
- Lynn -
INTERCOT Staff: Theme Parks, DVC
-
You know your child best, but that would have been way too long for us when our boys were those ages. We did a 3 night trip when our youngest was around that age and it was about 2 days too long.
Our biggest issue was (and still is) sleeping in hotels. Our boys had a very hard time with that when they were really little. They'd be up every couple hours, and then, we would be too. We were EXHAUSTED on those little short getaways. I would have had to be committed to a mental hospital if we tried to do a 9 night getaway.
A big way to make this a LOT easier on everyone is to get a room where the kid can sleep separate from the parents. I'd get a 1 br villa over a studio, even if it means less days.
19 months is a tricky age in general (the terrible twos start around this time). Kids are mobile, but not too mobile. They get fussy in strollers and want to walk, but you can't always let them. They can talk a bit but not enough to really communicate effectively. Tantrums come about at the drop of a hat, usually due to communication breakdown, being overtired, hungry, etc. WDW is very stimulating, and while some kids love this, others get overstimulated and just break down a lot. You see it in the parks all the time. Parents that aren't sleeping well are cranky too...it's a vicious cycle.
I'd say 5-7 days at WDW with a 19 month old is good for a first trip. You can see how it goes, and if it is just super wonderful, you can do a longer trip next time. However, if things go south, you'll be happy it's a shorter trip.
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
-
I totally get where you are coming from that 9 days would give you lots of relaxation time and make visiting the parks easier, but unless your 19 months is used to long trips, 9 days may be too much.
With both my children 4-5 days was best at that age. We did take it slow and we did sacrifice doing somethings.My daughter loves Disney but was ready to go home and be in her own room with her own things after 4 or 5 days.
If you can swing it, Lynn's suggestion on a 1 bedroom is excellent. Having the washing machine is a huge plus when travelling with little kids.
Cindy aka AgentC
INTERCOT Staff: Accommodations, Dining, Movies, TV, Music & Musicals
-
I would look at a 1 bedroom too. Our boys can't fall asleep with us in the room which means in a studio we either have to go to bed when they do which makes us grumpy or they have to stay up until we go to bed which makes them grumpy. A 1 bedroom allows them to follow their own routine better and gives DH and I time alone after they go to bed.
Kristin
Momma to two sweet boys: Myers and Jacob
36 trips and counting!
-
As other posters have mentioned, it depends a lot on your child. For our children (just turned 2 and 4 and almost 5 months) a longer, more relaxed trip works really well. They love spending all of that time as a family without the interruptions of laundry, errands, Daddy working, etc. (We were in a studio on our last trip and will do the same on our next visit.) I wouldn't hesitate to be gone for nine nights in terms of their happiness. However, it is a lot of work to get us ready for that length of trip
-
Yep, totally depends on your kid. We did our first visit (8 days/7 nights) when they were 18 mos and 3 1/2. It was a truly magical trip that I will NEVER forget. (although they don't really remember it ;-) The time was perfect for us because we did move slowly and only did a few things in the morning, then napped, then a few more at night. We also stayed in the Fort Wilderness cabins so we had a separate bedroom for the kids and a full kitchen. I STRONGLY suggest looking into this option. But you again, you know your kid. We also appreciated having grown up time after they went to bed. We could see wishes from our deck in FW. It was a ways away, but still magical! Whatever you decide to do, just don't try to do too much on any given day. Good Luck! (Oh, also the BLT 1 BRs have washer/dryers IN THE ROOM!!)
BLT 8 - 2012
CR 11-2009
DL/GC 11-2007
YC 6-2006
GF 12-2005
FW 5-2004
FW 2-2001
FW 10-2000
Off site 1-1998
-
We did 8 nights with a 17-month old in June, and it was probably a bit too long for us. We had a studio, and maybe a 1 bedroom would have helped, but I think he would have been tired regardless. We still had fun, though!
Apr 2014 - AKL Kidani Village
Feb 2014 - Grand Floridian
Jan 2014 - Port Orleans Riverside
Nov 2012 - Saratoga Springs
June 2012 - AKL Jambo House
June 2010 - Beach Club
May 2006 - Offsite
Apr 2004 - Port Orleans Riverside
Apr 1997 - Offsite
May 1995 - Offsite
DVC - Animal Kingdom Villas
-
OP, I suggest waiting about a year, and then revisit this question. From the timing of your trip to be NEXT October (I thought you meant this October), your little one is still a baby! You have NO idea how your baby will be as a toddler. Perhaps if you want to start planning/budgeting, do so for a longer trip, and then readjust if necessary closer to the travel time.
My oldest son was a DREAM of a baby. When he was 6 months old or so, I would have planned a two week trip to WDW without hesitation. A LOT changed by the time he was 19 months old. A lot.
I would suggest planning a couple short overnights in hotels near your home to do some "local" tourist stuff, just to see how your child does away from home prior to doing a long WDW trip. It's a good way to gauge how you want to plan longer trips.
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
Share This Thread On Social Media:
Share This Thread On Social Media:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Share This Thread On Social Media: