|
|
|
-
Disney Wins Ruling Pooh Suit
From the Orlando Sentinel
"Disney wins a ruling in long Pooh dispute
By Meg James | Times Staff Writer
Posted March 28, 2007
A federal judge Tuesday dismissed several claims against Walt Disney Co. brought by a Beverly Hills family that holds the merchandising rights to Winnie the Pooh.
U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper threw out three of the Slesinger family's claims in a case dealing with copyright for Winnie the Pooh. Cooper set aside the Slesingers' nine other claims, saying they should be resolved after a decision is reached in an appeal of a related state court case, which Disney won.
"We're pleased with the court's decision," said Daniel Petrocelli, Disney's attorney in the long-running litigation.
Patricia Slesinger saw a silver lining in the judge's decision. "The ruling allows our case to proceed," she said.
In February, Cooper handed the family a rare victory, dismissing a copyright lawsuit that sought to end Disney's obligation to pay the family royalties for sales of Pooh merchandise.
The Slesinger family has said that its claims against the Burbank entertainment giant could be worth as much as $2 billion.
In 1961, the family, which inherited the merchandising rights to Pooh from Slesinger's father, transferred those rights to Disney in exchange for royalties.
But the partnership became contentious. In 1991, the Slesingers sued Disney in state court, alleging breach of contract and fraud. They claimed that through the years Disney had cheated them out of hundreds of millions of dollars in profit from Pooh.
A state court judge tossed out that breach-of-contract case in 2004. That judge, finding misconduct on the part of the family, accused it of trying to gain an edge in the litigation by stealing confidential Disney documents from the company's trash, and then lying and altering court papers to cover up the thefts."
74 Off Site
98 Contemporary & DCL inaugural cruise
99 Dixie Landings
00 Dixie Landings
01 POR & DCL
02 AKL & DCL
03 VB
04 DL GC
05 ASSp, VWL, GF
06 POFQ, CSR, OKW
07 ASMo & VWL
08 Pop VWL
09 BW, POR, VWL, CSR
10 WL
12 VWL, AKL Club
13 VWL, WL Club
-
Please Support INTERCOT's Sponsors:
-
That last paragraph speaks volumes about this entire case. If it was a legitimate breach of contract, why are they digging through Disney's garbage and lying on court documents to cover it up.....
WDW - 1977-86, 1989, 1993, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007(x3), 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014, 2016 (Oct.)
DLR - 1989, 2007, 2010
-
I've read quite a bit about the suit and I actually think it's the fault of a very vaguely worded original contract.
There's grey area around whether or not merchandising or DVD/VHS sales revenue was to be included in their percentage of royalties or not.
The Slesingers say yes and Disney (obviously) says no. Why they dug through the trash and all that I have no idea, but from what I've seen the suit at least has enough legal merit on some points to move forward and be decided in a court of law. I think there are some legitimate contractual points that need to be ruled on.
Ian ºOº
INTERCOT Senior Imagineer
Veteran of over 60 trips to Disney theme parks and proud to have stayed in every Disney resort in the continental United States! º0º
Next trip:
April 2018 - Saratoga Springs Treehouse
Help support INTERCOT's sponsors!!!
-
Uh, all these "I want money" make me so sad...
Walt was ½ Canadian!
DL, Aug 97; DL, Jul 01; DL, Aug 05; DL, Jan 06; WDW, Oct 06; DL, Dec 06; WDW, Nov 07; DL, Dec 07; DL, Jun 08; DL, Feb 09; DLP, Apr 09; DL, Sep 09; TDL, Oct 09; DL, Jun 10; WDW, Oct, 10; WDW, May, 13; WDW, Sep 14; HKDL, Sep 15, WDW, Mar 17; WDW Jan 19.
-
This type of case is going to become more and more common with the new technology available. I mean I still remember sending out footage from MTV for particular shows that stated 30 second clip to be used in (insert show title here) that will air on (Network) on a certain date. Later the legal department would come and pull the records looking to see the agreement especially if that show was going to video or even if the show was going to re-air on a later date. Disney is having a similar type dispute with Starz regarding exclusive content. I'm sure none of the older contracts mention Blu-Ray or Itunes. I'm sure in the future we see these contracts being written to cover distribution on other media formats but for now most are very specific and outdated.
The best example that fits the Disney Pooh case would be recording artists whose royalty contracts didn't include CD royalties only records and tapes.
Jeff (aka JPL)
Former VMK alias figgiefig
Intercot Staff
Disney Tech - Software, Games & Web
The Locker Room
Disney Vacation Club
[email protected]
"Remember it all started with a Mouse"
-
Originally Posted by battle beast
Uh, all these "I want money" make me so sad...
So, if you were a member of this family that claims they were not paid royaltues that they maintain they were due, you would just say "oh, well" and not fight for it?
I have no idea who is right or wrong in this case (the truth is probably somewhere in the middle), but with this much money at stake I am sure most people woulld fight for it.
"Why is the rum always gone?"
Jun 09 - Old Key West
Apr 08 - Disney Cruise
Dec 07 - Ft Wilderness
Feb 07 - Animal Kingdom
Apr 06 - Disney Cruise
Dec 05 - Wilderness Lodge
Mar 05 - Wilderness Lodge
Dec 04 - Car. Beach
Aug 03 - Car. Beach
Jun 02 - Port Orleans
Oct 98 - All Star Music
Share This Thread On Social Media:
Share This Thread On Social Media:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Share This Thread On Social Media: